Due Diligence

The search for our church’s new youth pastor took nearly 6 months. Our team did its due diligence in searching for the right candidate for the job. We interviewed four people, we prayed, we conducted background checks, and we weighed out our options. Our church believes in the next generation and our church leadership wanted to ensure that the right person for the job was in place.

In other words, we wanted to cover all of our basis for the betterment of our future generations.

Any kind of new hire or appointed individual for any business or organization, both for profit and non-profit, would go through the same rigors of vetting potential candidates. Given these realities, there shouldn’t be any complaints about the further investigation into the allegations that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh committed sexually inappropriate actions toward Christine Blasey Ford.

In fact, we shouldn’t expect anything less.

If Kavanaugh truly is innocent, then the investigation will only solidify his nomination and we can proceed toward his confirmation. But we can not take lightly Ford’s cry. We can not simply write her off just because the timing of her accusations are decades late. We can not silence her claims just because she seems like a leftist loud mouth, as many right wing conservatives are claiming.

And, to throw the Christian perspective into the equation, those who follow Jesus should desire the truth to come out. We shouldn’t relent until justice is found. As followers of Jesus, we shouldn’t simply call foul against Ford just because the SCOTUS nominee is a “conservative”.

The majority of my fellow Evangelical Christians have raised their voices against the process, claiming a feminist/liberal agenda. It’s ironic because those same brothers and sisters have also rallied against Hollywood programming because of the likes of Bill Cosby, Kevin Spacey, and Harvey Weinstein. Yet, because Kavanaugh was nominated by Number 45, many of my fellow conservative Republicans are outraged by the call for due diligence.

Jesus wasn’t liberal or conservative nor was He a Republican or a Democratic. Jesus was for the innocent. He was for the poor and the rejected. Jesus was a voice for the unheard.

And, as followers of Jesus, we should follow in His footsteps toward releasing folks into freedom. Jesus was for people and so should we.


Submitting to the Government

Yes, but context is everything. We have to be very careful when we cite Scripture as a basis for our actions.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions recently quoted Romans 13 to hit back at the “concerns raised by our church friends about separating families.” He called the criticism “not fair or logical” and quoted the passage in his defense of the administration’s tough policies on illegal immigration.

Governments, back when the Book of Romans was written, was far from being a democracy. In a democracy we understand that there is a sense in which we, the people, are the government, and should not hesitate to help “govern” our democracy through our participation in the democratic process. That’s the beauty of our freedom, both in Christ and in our country.

Having said that, as believers, especially living under the dynamics of a democracy, when the government commands us to do something that is disobedient to God’s Word, we must resist the government and obey God.

For example, when the Sanhedrin commanded Peter and John to stop speaking in the name of Jesus, they replied “Whether it is right in the sight of God to give heed to you rather than to God, you be the judge; for we cannot stop speaking about what we have seen and heard (Acts 4:19-20).” Later, when the command was repeated, Peter answered, “We must obey God rather than men (Acts 5:29).” And, going a bit old school, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-nego refused to bow before Nebuchadnezzar’s idol (Dan. 3). Similarly, in defiance of the king’s edict, Daniel continued to pray even though the ruler told the prophet not to (Dan. 6); or King, Bonhoeffer, and other more modern revolutionaries who stood up against the laws of man for the good of Kingdom principles.

With that said, immigration is a complex issue. I understand the need to tighten up our borders and I agree that our government should work to create a better system by which we process those currently here illegally and those who want to come here through legit avenues. But, in submission to God’s Law; which trumps man’s law (no pun intended), the Bible says, “And if a stranger dwells with you in your land, you shall not mistreat him. The stranger who dwells among you shall be to you as one born among you, and you shall love him as yourself; for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God (Leviticus 19:33-34).”

The Bible is also clear as to how we’re to treat orphans and widows. God desires for us to look after the widow and the orphan, as James 1:27 says, “Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.” Having policies that separate children from their parents go against the core desires of God.

“Laws are good, and order is good, but that doesn’t mean that separating families from each other is a good law,” Gabriel Salguero, president of the National Latino Evangelical Coalition, said. “There are good laws, and there are bad laws, and separating families from each other is a bad policy. We’re not against the law, we’re against bad laws and bad policies.”

All that to say, using Scripture to justify your actions and to strong arm the believing community into submission is wrong. We, as believers, do have an obligation to submit to our governing authority, but we also have an obligation to filter our current laws and policies through the laws of God.

As image bearers of God, we have an obligation to care for one another. We have an obligation to treat one another with dignity and respect. We have an obligation to love, as God loves us.